Page 1 of 1

0.10.12 compare dtc filter 2 bug

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 2:17 pm
by bachig24u
Hi Matt,
I was comparing bins from various extractions when I noticed 'purple' highlighting on dtc filter 2 for no reason.

looking at the comparison value, it appeared the same. The only difference was noticed in dtc filter 1 which also was 'purple' in compare mode.
compare-dtc-bug.jpg
(150.86 KiB) Downloaded 2696 times
not sure if dtc filter tables could be or should be seperated so I though best bring to your attention.

I've attached the bins also.

Re: 0.10.12 compare dtc filter 2 bug

Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 6:21 pm
by Matt
Yeah shouldnt be highlighted. Added to list

Re: 0.10.12 compare dtc filter 2 bug

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 11:40 pm
by Matt
Problem was the address file entry in several address files including CR31

Changing the address file entries from 1,16,1,16 for these to 1,1,1,1 fixes the issue in the interim. I've updated all the address files affected and tested. These will be available in the next release

Re: 0.10.12 compare dtc filter 2 bug

Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 10:01 pm
by bachig24u
would that have affected the usage of the DTC's..
e.g. not being able to mask them out?

Re: 0.10.12 compare dtc filter 2 bug

Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:13 pm
by Matt
No it doesnt affect those. The ranges in the address files made Nistune comparison think it was a 16x1 table so following bytes after the DTC range were used in comparison

In regards to the actual DTC filter byte changed, only a single value was being altered directly from the flags window