Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Nistune topics related specifically to the 6303 cpu

Moderator: Matt

Post Reply
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

On Z32ECU ->

The Sync Accel Temp Factor Table looks odd (off the scale).

What does it actually do? And what are the other two tables for please?

Also shouldn't the AlphaN Increase Table not rather be grouped under Throttle Enrichment
NTSYNC.JPG
(151.46 KiB) Downloaded 2253 times
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Matt »

Tables available in 'expert user mode' are not all necessarily documented or functions completely decoded

However, the temperature factor is the main table used to adjust for synchronous acceleration (when throttle is opening). It is the base table, which the others are multiplied by. More info here:
https://www.nistune.com/docs/Workshop%2 ... %20Web.pdf

With the Z32 ECU, I've determiend that 64 is 100% at normal operating temperature, but when solder than 80degC then reaches upto 223%, hence the display in the graphics. I guess I could adjust the scaling from say 0%-200% to normalise the display, but its not that important
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

Thanks Matt,

On page 13 the document says I should disable the Alpha/N table on turbo charged vehicles.
However on Z32 this table is valid (judging from the OEM Roms)
NT_A_N_Z32.JPG
(26.58 KiB) Downloaded 2228 times
I'm not sure I understand the difference between Alpha N Increase Fuel (ANIF) function and
the Sync Tables.

My car runs quite rich when I press down the throttle quicker than under normal conditions, so for example while accelerating a bit more pronounced.
That doesn't happen when I press the throttle slowly.
I have no AFR measurements atm but I can see in the rear view mirror that it's running rich.

So I was thinking that maybe one of the accel tables operates in % not considering the larger injectors.
(similar to the cranking tables)
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Matt »

Original R33 Alpha/N ECU values copied from the R33 RB25DET ECU had a table looking like this

NA Z32 also had a lower value table, but turbo ones maxed them out (from memory)

Set your table to 255. When TPS goes over the line in this table it will access the last column of the fuel map (in the background) which may make it run rich
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

The RB25 table looks like this, though I don't know if that's transferable to the Z32 table with the same name:
NT_RB25_AN.JPG
(27.92 KiB) Downloaded 2216 times
All Z32TT OEM files have the same table values.
NT_Z32_AC.JPG
(107.67 KiB) Downloaded 2216 times
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Matt »

Those are all VG30DETT (turbo ones) not VG30DE which are non turbo
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

I think we are out of cadence ... or maybe I understood something wrong.

But what I got from your response was that I should disable that table by setting all values to 255, right??

I replied I don't see why, because the Z32TT has that table enabled.
and my car is RB25DET.
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Matt »

Yes set to 255 (whole table) on RB25DET

Z32 normally only used this enrichment abover 1500rpm and above 1000-1300mV TPS values (so stabbing throttle under 1500rpm will make it use last column in fuel map)
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

But wouldn't this disable enrichment functionality completely?
I think I tried that once and the throttle response got sluggish.

You wrote the Z32 (I assume TT) uses enrichment only over 1500rpm.

My understanding of this table is as follows:

255/FF in tables disables any enrichment.
The mV denotes the threshold voltage were enrichment is enabled @ rpm on the X-Axis.

So on Z32TT enrichment only takes place till around 1500rpm.
Right?
NTZ32ENRICH.JPG
(63.63 KiB) Downloaded 2207 times
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Matt »

But wouldn't this disable enrichment functionality completely?
Yes. We normally disable it during tuning so it is not jumping to last column (invisibly) whilst trying to adjust the maps
I think I tried that once and the throttle response got sluggish
If you find after tuning that you need to lower the bottom end for better response then that is fine. It will just use the last colunn of the fuel map when your throttle goes over the mv values in this table at said RPM
You wrote the Z32 (I assume TT) uses enrichment only over 1500rpm.
Sorry that should have been _under_ 1500. Details of this table are in the mapping guide also
255/FF in tables disables any enrichment.
TPS doesn't normally reach 5.12 volts (5120mV = 255 raw value) so if the table values are set this high, then the ECU never moves to last column to do this enrichment
The mV denotes the threshold voltage were enrichment is enabled @ rpm on the X-Axis
Correct
So on Z32TT enrichment only takes place till around 1500rpm.
Correct
Torque
 

Posts: 639
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Sync Accel Temp Factor?

Post by Torque »

OK, yes .. all good then.
Thanks for the explanation .. good point disabling it during tuning!
Post Reply