Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM?

Discuss software bugs and related problems here.

Moderator: Matt

Post Reply
tim_tub
 

Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Sweden

Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM?

Post by tim_tub »

Hi

Is there a bug in the Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM diagram?
The diagram sais for example 15 at 0 rpm when there should be 31 according to the information in that cell and if I change the cell to 15 or lower it "goes crazy".

I'm running 1.2.11
IDT-bug.jpg
Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM
(314.25 KiB) Downloaded 1786 times
IDT-bug2.jpg
(133.73 KiB) Downloaded 1786 times
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM?

Post by Matt »

The Nissan ECU uses an offset for some of the timing tables

So raw value - offset = graph value

Right click to use filtered values

Dont change it to '16' raw value, but use the original value and the graph as a guide
tim_tub
 

Posts: 13
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:34 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM?

Post by tim_tub »

Thanks Matt!
I was just playing whit the settings offline (haven't used NisTune for a while!) so I wasn't planning on doing anything particular but I thought this was a bitt odd when I saw it!

But I don't understand why I get 127 filtered when I enter 15 raw.
(Warning, stupid question) Shouldn't it be 0 or perhaps minus "something"?
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Re: Faulty diagram for Idle/Deceleration Timing vs RPM?

Post by Matt »

I think the value wrapped around there
Post Reply