Converting Datalogged load to Scaled Load (Tp)

Questions that get asked a lot.

Moderator: Matt

Post Reply
J30_VG33ET
 

Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Goleta, CA, USA

Converting Datalogged load to Scaled Load (Tp)

Post by J30_VG33ET »

If you'd like to convert the load logged in the CSV file by NIStune to the scale on the tables, divide by 256.

Example:
14325 / 256 = Tp of 56
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Post by Matt »

the big guage will show this inside [] square backets but i will add it to the other displays also so it makes more sense
J30_VG33ET
 

Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:13 am
Location: Goleta, CA, USA

Post by J30_VG33ET »

I noticed that you added this to the log file. Could this be a separate column so the data can be sorted (easily)? It's kinda a pain to manually strip the [] from the Tp values.

Maybe call it TP (MSB), like MAF (LHS).
UNISA JECS
 

Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 3:48 am
Location: USA Socal

Post by UNISA JECS »

J30_VG33ET wrote:I noticed that you added this to the log file. Could this be a separate column so the data can be sorted (easily)? It's kinda a pain to manually strip the [] from the Tp values.

Maybe call it TP (MSB), like MAF (LHS).
I actually had the same question for sorting purposes only.
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Post by Matt »

it could be added as a separate consult register instead, which may be better
JasonKemmerer
 

Posts: 38
Joined: Sat May 03, 2008 8:03 am

Post by JasonKemmerer »

Since we're on the topic of calculating TP, what is the equation to do this?
I tried the equation on the Nistune Mapping Guide:
Theoretical Pulse width (TP) = MAF Lookup * Injector multiplier

So for example we get a value for MAF Lookup or VQ of 14372 (3.2v for a Z32 MAF). Multiplied by 288 (again Z32 370cc INJ). We get 4139136! So even if we divide it by 256 the # is still ridiculously high.

The other equation I have that seems to work but not sure its 100% is this:
TP=(VQ*K Value/CAS Value)/ # of cylinders.
Where CAS=RPM/50x256

any thoughts?
Matt
Site Admin
 

Posts: 8961
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 1:45 am
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Contact:

Post by Matt »

the first is just a generalisation in how things

the second is more accurate description. the true description is dependent on ECU type and is described in the appropriate patent description for the specific ECU model in question

For example the zemulator used a theoretical forumula derived from MAF voltage to work out its trace but that doesnt work the same for all types of ECUs due to variation in formula
Post Reply